Governance
Dean’s Council
Duties: The Dean’s Council works with the Dean to determine broad medical school policies and strategic plans. It does this primarily by (a) ensuring that all recommendations
regarding policies and strategic plans have been developed with the consideration of how they effect the entire School and not just a single domain, (b) synthesizing, coordinating and
evaluating the initiatives put forward by the Councils into cohesive strategic plans and objectives1, (c) initiating recommendations regarding policies and priorities in the use of
resources, and (d) acting on recommendations from the Oversight Committee.
These functions will be achieved through the consideration of (a) the overall use and commitment of resources and the availability of resources for newly developed policies and plans; (b)
how new policies put forth by a Council fit within the strategic plans/goals/objectives of the school as a whole; (c) possible synergies between new proposals and other school needs and goals;
and, importantly, (d) the consequences of policies developed by one Council on the entire faculty and students. Thus, while most policies will be developed in the Councils, the Dean’s Council
plays a critical integrative function. It bears the final responsibility for evaluating the impact of proposed policies and plans on the School of Medicine and its faculty as a whole.
In addition to considering the policies and recommendations sent from the Councils, the Dean’s Council may be assigned tasks by the Dean, the Executive Vice President, or the Board
of Directors. The Dean’s Council will then
delegate tasks to the Councils or, if appropriate, delegate an ad hoc committee to address the task.2
The Dean’s Council will also lead the effort to educate the administration of the School of Medicine and of the Health Center about the impact its policy decisions have on the ability of the faculty to do
its work and to negotiate ways to streamline the processes. This charge focuses on, for example, the administrative requirements for hiring new faculty members, for spending research dollars,
and for implementing approved strategic plans.
Authority: The Dean’s Council advises the Dean regarding strategic planning and resource allocation decisions. When the Dean’s Council finds an impediment to the implementation of a
decision or recommendation of a Council, it can (a) return the decision or policy to the Council from which it originated with feedback on the flaws or impediments to implementation, (b) send
the decision or policy to a different Council to get further information on the consequences and ways to ameliorate those consequences, or (c) reject the recommendation outright.
The Dean’s Council has authority to overturn a negative decision by the Senior Appointments and Promotions Committee on promotion or tenure only on non-academic grounds.
The Dean’s Council approves the operating rules and guidelines of all governance committees, and designates departments and centers as either “basic science” or “clinical”.
The Dean’s Council will arrange an election, make an appointment, or delegate the appropriate Council to make an appointment when a University, Health Center, Dental School, Graduate School
or other non-School of Medicine committee, or the Board of Directors, desires official representation from the School of Medicine.
The Dean’s Council holds elections for all School of Medicine governance committees. Elections, to be held annually, must provide the opportunity for faculty to nominate self or others.
All terms are three years.
Voting:
- Andrew Arnold, ‘08
- James Egan, ‘09
- Richard Fortinsky, ‘09
- Bruce Gould, ex officio
- Bruce Koeppen, ex officio (Chair)
- Marc Lalande, ‘10
- Leslie Loew, ‘08
- Kiki Nissen, ‘10
- Achilles Pappano, ‘10
- Richard Simon, ‘09
- Peter Albertsen, ex officio
- CAO for Research, ex officio
|
Non-voting:
- Peter Deckers, ex officio
- David Gillon, ex officio
|
1 The Dean’s Council does not rework or re-think the policy or decision itself.
2 The latter would be especially appropriate when tasks that do not neatly fit within the domains need to be addressed, such as the development of a new faculty compensation plan,
revisions to the grievance procedures, or revisions to the criteria for promotion to senior rank.
MEETING SCHEDULE
Meetings are on the third Monday of every month from 3:30 to 5 p.m. in the Walker Academic Affairs Conference Room, AG070.
2008 Meetings:
February 18
March 17
April 21
May 19
June 16
July 21
August 18
September 15
October 20
November 17
December 15
Meeting Minutes
All minutes are in PDF.
|
2006 Minutes
April 10, 2006
April 18, 2006
May 8, 2006
June 7, 2006
July 5, 2006
October 4, 2006
November 1, 2006
November 13, 2006
December 6, 2006
(also
see Department of
Pharmacology Recommendation)
December 18, 2006 |
2007 Minutes
January 3, 2007
January 15, 2007
February 7, 2007
February 19, 2007
March 7, 2007
March 19, 2007
April 4, 2007
May 2, 2007
May 21, 2007
June 18, 2007
August 1, 2007
August 20, 2007
September 5, 2007
October 15, 2007
November 19, 2007
December 17, 2007 |
2008 Minutes
March 10, 2008
March 17, 2008 |
|